Skip to content

EdTech Leader Jake Carwell, VP of School Solutions at Point Quest Group, Says This Will Matter

Tell us about your company and the problem it solves, or its benefit to learners or educators.

Point Quest Group is a specialized educational solutions provider that partners directly with K-12 school districts nationwide to deliver comprehensive special education, adolescent behavioral health, non-public therapeutic day schools, full evaluation services, and related student services for all components of the IEP.

Unlike multidisciplinary staffing agencies or healthcare firms that run clinics on the side, Point Quest is 100% focused on K-12 educational outcomes. We address two fundamental challenges in school districts:

  • Comprehensive Student Support: We support students facing complex emotional, behavioral, and developmental needs through our non-public therapeutic day school campuses as well as integrated, in-district programs, which includes telehealth.
  • Capacity and Talent Stabilization: We go beyond filling empty seats with warm bodies. We supply fully trained, supported providers across all IEP service areas to help stabilize school teams. We’re former special education directors, principals, and clinical experts, and we act as partners. We provide no-cost, high-caliber training and professional development to district teams, and help schools and districts build long-term local capacity, improve retention, and address the root causes of their operational challenges.
Jake Carwell, VP of School Solutions at Point Quest Group.
What is the challenge educators face today that is fixable?

The fixable challenge is preventable educator burnout caused by administrative overload, lack of classroom support, and reactive systems.

A common misconception is that special education burnout is driven by the students themselves. In reality, burnout stems from the job: excessive paperwork, endless compliance evaluations, and a lack of support.

We can solve this by targeting root causes over quick fixes. We often see schools struggle to fill the same vacant roles over and over again. We need to figure out why classrooms are in distress and provide proactive behavioral, clinical, and administrative support to stabilize the learning environment.

Many districts default to immediate special education evaluations because early intervention systems are missing. Strengthening Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) prevents students from being prematurely labeled, which can lighten the evaluation caseload on school psychologists and speech-language pathologists. Bridging teletherapy alongside these early tiers provides flexible, rapid access to mental health professionals, occupational therapists, and speech therapists, ensuring students get timely support before issues escalate.

And lastly, giving educators and therapists access to compliant, educator-aligned AI tools can help strip away repetitive data collection and administrative tasks, and help them get those hours back for instruction and direct student engagement.

What is the challenge educators face today that will persist?
Photo credit: Point Quest Group

The biggest long-term challenge is keeping up with the growing complexity of student behavioral and mental health needs while also finding enough qualified professionals to provide the support students need.

Since the pandemic, districts across the country have reported that more students, including those entering kindergarten and elementary school, are arriving with weaker social, emotional, and self-regulation skills than in previous years. As those needs continue to grow, schools need more specialized staff at a time when recruiting and retaining them has become increasingly difficult.

Today, roughly one in eight special education positions remains vacant or is filled by uncertified staff. An aging workforce is retiring, and many newer professionals have different expectations about how they want to work, including a preference for telepractice roles. Building a workforce that can meet rising student needs will continue to be one of education’s biggest challenges.

What are the areas of education or training and workforce development that are being overlooked?

There are two: school-specific behavioral and related services training, and clinical onboarding that goes beyond basic compliance.

Photo credit: Point Quest Group

Many organizations attempt to import clinic-based Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) or healthcare models directly into a school environment. In a clinic, providers have 1-on-1 control in a structured, quiet setting with high parental involvement. In a school, providers navigate eight to 12 students in a school setting with shifting schedules. Training clinicians specifically for the realities of a school environment is routinely overlooked.

The broader industry routinely focuses on adding what I’d call “more meat to the grinder”—recruiting new staff into high-turnover vacancies—rather than keeping existing educators from burning out in the first place. High-quality supervision, continuous clinical mentorship, and professional development are necessary for retention, and are things most multidisciplinary firms ignore.

What do you foresee will be a challenge in education in three to five years?

Over the next three to five years, we’ll continue to struggle between shifting federal regulatory frameworks and funding models and the need to maintain quality, high-touch support.

As federal oversight mechanisms, Office for Civil Rights (OCR) backlogs, and federal IDEA/funding structures shift, the burden of compliance will fall even more heavily onto state and local levels (which already fund ~85% of public education). Districts relying on basic compliance risk falling behind. Organizations must operate on the principle that quality compels compliance; that aiming higher than minimum regulatory baselines ensures long-term stability regardless of political shifts.

I also think that harnessing AI (for data collection and IEP development) alongside proprietary telepractice platforms will be vital for maintaining services. However, schools will struggle to adopt technology without compromising therapeutic quality or individualization. The challenge will be in ensuring that technology empowers educators and doesn’t endanger quality, in-person clinical and specialized service expertise.